Check a property
Cases

What the sale dossierdoes not disclose.

Three buyer archetypes, three classes of pre-purchase risk that QuickLease checks for before the notary appointment. These are illustrative scenarios — not testimonials and not client cases — built from the regulatory patterns the four-layer audit examines.

When a single community vote takes Airbnb off the table.

Situation
A retired couple from Manchester targets a two-bed flat in central Marbella. The plan: short-let it eight months a year and use it themselves three weeks per summer. The agent positions it as a turnkey rental.
The risk
Suppose the community of owners has a recorded Article 17.12 LPH resolution restricting tourist use that the sale dossier does not surface. The scenario is designed to show why the community records have to be checked before purchase.
What QuickLease would check
In this illustration, Layer 01 would surface the relevant community resolution and Layer 02 would test the municipal licensing position. The exact legal effect depends on the property-specific records the lawyer reviews.
Decision this could enable
A buyer who receives those findings before signing could compare another property, renegotiate or stop the purchase before committing further capital.

When two of three target properties sit inside a saturated zone.

Situation
A Miami-based investor wants to acquire three flats in Ruzafa to operate as a short-term portfolio, structured as a small Spanish SL.
The risk
Suppose two target flats fall inside a municipal area where new tourist-rental authorisations are restricted while a third does not. The scenario illustrates why portfolio buyers need address-by-address municipal and registry checks.
What QuickLease would check
In this illustration, Layer 02 would inspect the municipal position for each address and Layer 04 would inspect the relevant tourism-registry status. The actual result is property-specific.
Decision this could enable
An investor who receives different findings across the three addresses could proceed only with properties that fit the intended rental strategy or redirect capital before purchase.

When the right rental classification is the difference between €0 and €30,000 in sanctions.

Situation
A Galway-based retiree buys a villa in the Cádiz province to live in eight months a year and rent during her four months in Ireland. Her intent is alquiler de temporada — seasonal, multi-week tenancies — not tourist rental.
The risk
Suppose the intended use may fall into a different rental regime from the one assumed in the sales or marketing material. The scenario illustrates why the lawyer has to classify the intended use before relying on a tourist-rental registration path.
What QuickLease would check
In this illustration, Layer 03 would analyse the regional rules relevant to the intended use and Layer 04 would check the corresponding tourism-registry position. The lawyer would state the property-specific conclusion in the report.
Decision this could enable
A buyer who has the classification resolved before purchase can decide whether the property and intended rental model still fit, and can take the written legal conclusion to the relevant advisers.

Your case sits in a different jurisdiction?

Write to María Luisa de Castro with the property location and the kind of rental you are considering. You will receive a jurisdiction-specific scope reply within one business day.

Ask about your case →See pricing